Nigeria’s frontline organized private sector (OPS) advocacy group, the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE) has stressed that the collective dream for a Nigeria with good opportunities for current and upcoming generations’ socio-economic prosperity will not be achieved if priority is not given to industrialization by the Federal Government and other stakeholders in their development plans for the country.
The Centre, in a Brief Note titled ‘Manufacturing Under Democracy: A Story Of Resilience Amid Structural Adversity’ signed by its Chief Executive Officer, Dr Muda Yusuf, to commemorate Nigeria’s 2026 Democracy Day, pointed out that an unmistakable lesson that had been learnt in Nigeria’s 26 years of democratic governance was that industrialisation cannot flourish in an environment of structural inefficiencies and policy uncertainty.
Yusuf, a renowned economist, who took a cursory appraisal of the economic policies and programmes of the successive administrations over the past years, lamented that since the return to democratic governance, Nigeria’s manufacturing sector remained largely trapped in a low-growth equilibrium.
Citing statistical data to justify the CPPE’s stance on the nation’s economic growth, he noted that the manufacturing sector’s contribution to GDP had hovered around 9–10 per cent for most of the period, underscoring the absence of a decisive industrial transformation despite successive policy pronouncements and reform initiatives.
- Advertisement -
According to the CPPE boss, industrialisation is the engine room of economic transformation. It creates quality jobs, deepens value addition, strengthens export competitiveness and reduces vulnerability to external shocks. Yet, Nigeria’s democratic journey has delivered only modest industrial outcomes, leaving the economy heavily dependent on primary commodities and imports.
Describing the long period of democratic governance in the country as an era of moving from industrial promise to industrial erosion, Yusuf pointed out that one of the defining features of the democratic era has been the progressive erosion of industrial capacity across several sectors.
He further clarified: “The collapse of the nation’s public refineries remains perhaps the most striking example. What should have been strategic industrial assets became victims of poor governance, policy failures, weak accountability and entrenched rent-seeking. Over time, the refineries deteriorated into symbols of institutional dysfunction, culminating in their complete shutdown and the loss of a critical pillar of industrialisation.
“The story is similar across several manufacturing subsectors. Textile mills that once employed hundreds of thousands of Nigerians have largely disappeared. The tyre industry collapsed. Battery manufacturing faded. Automobile assembly plants lost momentum. Many industrial clusters that once drove economic activity have either contracted significantly or vanished altogether.
“The consequence has been a gradual weakening of Nigeria’s industrial base and a growing dependence on imports for products that were once manufactured domestically”, the economist added.
Despite these challenges, the OPS advocacy group chief noted that a few sectors had demonstrated remarkable resilience, listing the cement industry as standing out as one of Nigeria’s most successful industrialisation stories. The food and beverage sector has also sustained growth despite an increasingly difficult operating environment.
Specifically, he stated that most notably, the emergence of the Dangote Refinery represented arguably the most transformative industrial investment in Nigeria’s recent history, noting that beyond refining petroleum products, the project has demonstrated the scale of industrial ambition required to reposition Nigeria as a major manufacturing and processing economy.
Yusuf maintained that though these achievements remained significant, they, however, owe more to private-sector vision, resilience and risk-taking than to the strength of the policy environment.
He noted that indeed, many successful manufacturers had thrived not because conditions were favourable, but despite formidable policy, regulatory and infrastructural obstacles, adding that their success is a testament to entrepreneurial determination rather than institutional effectiveness.
Reflecting on the structural constraints to a vibrant manufacturing industry over the years, Yusuf, a former Director-General of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) said power supply shortage and policy inconsistency and over-dependence on imported manufactured goods remained the most devastating on the ailing industry.
The CPPE boss expatiated: “The biggest obstacles confronting Nigerian manufacturers remain structural.
“Power supply continues to be one of the most binding constraints on industrial productivity. Manufacturers are compelled to self-generate energy at enormous cost, undermining competitiveness and eroding profitability.
“Logistics inefficiencies constitute another major burden. Decades of underinvestment in rail infrastructure have deprived manufacturers of a cost-effective cargo transportation system. Consequently, excessive dependence on road transport has inflated production and distribution costs, weakened supply chains and reduced competitiveness.
“The cost of finance remains equally prohibitive. With lending rates frequently ranging between 25 and 30 per cent, manufacturers face borrowing costs that are among the highest in the world. Such financing conditions are fundamentally incompatible with long-term industrial investment.
“No manufacturing economy can achieve global competitiveness when power is unreliable, logistics are inefficient and capital is prohibitively expensive.
“Another major challenge has been policy inconsistency. Successive administrations have oscillated between protection and liberalisation, creating uncertainty for investors. Industries that receive policy support today often find themselves exposed to intense import competition tomorrow.
“This inconsistency has undermined investment confidence and weakened industrial planning.
“Compounding the problem is the influx of imports from economies where production costs are significantly lower and government support for industry is much stronger. Nigerian manufacturers are therefore compelled to compete under profoundly asymmetric conditions.
“Smuggling has further diluted the effectiveness of tariff protection, exposing weaknesses in policy implementation and border enforcement. In many cases, the challenge is not the absence of policy but the absence of effective enforcement”, Yusuf stressed.
Consequently, he recalled that over the last two decades, Nigeria had witnessed a growing dominance of foreign-owned manufacturing enterprises, particularly from Asia, adding that while foreign direct investment is welcome and beneficial, the declining relative presence of indigenous manufacturers raises important concerns about local industrial capacity, domestic entrepreneurship and economic sovereignty.
The economist pointed out that an industrial ecosystem that increasingly relied on foreign ownership without simultaneously nurturing indigenous industrial champions risks weakening the foundations of sustainable industrial development.
On the recent economic reforms of the Federal Government and the emerging gains from the measures, the CPPE boss said that one notable achievement of recent economic reforms had been the improvement in foreign exchange market liquidity.
Noting that the severe foreign exchange crisis of 2022–2023 inflicted considerable damage on manufacturing, disrupting production, constraining imports of industrial inputs and forcing some firms to scale down operations, he maintained that the restoration of liquidity in the foreign exchange market had significantly improved manufacturers’ access to foreign exchange and reduced one of the most critical operational constraints facing the sector.
Yusuf further noted: “It is equally commendable that the government’s current fiscal policy framework provides substantial import duty concessions on critical manufacturing inputs, including raw materials, intermediate goods and industrial machinery, with tariff rates ranging from zero to 10 percent.
“This policy represents a significant boost to industrial competitiveness. By lowering production costs and easing the burden of imported inputs, it enhances manufacturers’ capacity to expand output, improve productivity, deepen value addition and strengthen their competitiveness in both domestic and export markets. It is a pragmatic fiscal intervention that supports industrialisation, investment growth and job creation”, he added.
On the CPPE’s advisory position on how to catalyze the ongoing drive to sustainably boost the nation’s economic growth, particularly through improved local productivity, the OPS advocacy group advocated: “Nigeria must move beyond an economy driven largely by consumption and import dependence towards one anchored on production, value addition and industrial competitiveness.
“The future of economic prosperity lies not in what Nigeria imports, but in what Nigeria produces. Manufacturing remains the bridge between natural resource wealth and broad-based prosperity. Until that bridge is strengthened, the promise of economic transformation will remain only partially fulfilled.
“Industrialisation is not merely an economic aspiration; it is the foundation of economic sovereignty, sustainable prosperity and national competitiveness in the twenty-first century”, it added.
On the future imperatives to reposition the manufacturing sector at the leading edge of competitive contribution to the GDP, the CPPE further canvassed: “Nigeria’s industrial future requires a deliberate and sustained commitment to competitiveness.
“Power sector reforms must deliver reliable and affordable electricity. Investments in rail infrastructure must be accelerated to reduce logistics costs. Development finance institutions should be strengthened to provide long-term industrial financing at concessionary rates.
“Government procurement policies should aggressively prioritise locally manufactured products. Executive orders promoting local content should move beyond rhetoric and become enforceable instruments of industrial policy.
“Security challenges must also be addressed with urgency. Insecurity has disrupted access to raw materials, constrained market expansion and weakened investment confidence across several manufacturing value chains.
“Equally important is the need to deepen backward integration and resource-based industrialisation. Countries become industrial powers by transforming their natural resource endowments into manufactured products, not by exporting raw materials and importing finished goods”, the CEO added.
